<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>dekstop weblog : define:elitism</title>
    <link>http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/</link>
    <description>How about this for a definition? It&apos;s just a small event, but their approach to invitations bugs me a lot. I was already wondering how O&apos;Reilly could keep up their seemingly altruistic behavior on such a massive scale, to the point where they&apos;re now more talked about for their community ...</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2005 Martin Dittus</dc:rights>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:59:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>MicroLinks 5.6 (dekstop.de)</generator>
    <managingEditor>public&#64;dekstop&#46;de</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>public&#64;dekstop&#46;de</webMaster>

    <item>
      <title>Comment on "define:elitism"</title>
      <link>http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/#34</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Did you actually read this text? </p>

<p>I realize that Tim O'Reilly currently has to cope with a lot of emotional reactions to the way Foocamp is organized, and I wouldn't want to be in his shoes right now.</p>

<p>But I can understand most of the reactions, and still stand by my posting, even after having cooled off a bit.</p>

<p>You can't participate in a community that builds on the open sharing of ideas, then hand-pick what you deem the "most interesting" people of this community and build a little boy's secret society, brag about it in public, and seriously expect that nobody responds.</p>

<p>So to answer your question: I wouldn't want to.</p>]]> &lt;p&gt;- martin&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/#34</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on "define:elitism"</title>
      <link>http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/#33</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>wtf? How about you organize an event like this just for the hell of it?</p>]]> &lt;p&gt;- <![CDATA[<a href="http://diveintomark.org" rel="nofollow">Mark Pilgrim</a>]]>&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:creator>Mark Pilgrim</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/#33</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 05:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title>define:elitism</title>
      <link>http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/</link> 
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How about <a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/16/foocampfighting/#comment-14206">this</a> for a definition?</p>

<p>It's just a small event, but their approach to invitations bugs me a lot. I was already wondering how O'Reilly could keep up their seemingly altruistic behavior on such a massive scale, to the point where they're now more talked about for their community involvements and conferences than for their books. Apparently they couldn't.</p>

<p>It should have been clear that their main interests are not simply to advance technology, to help create new ideas, but that these are just tools to earn money. I simply forgot about that, and liked them a bit more for their apparent openness and enthusiasm. For the apparent attitude of leaving behind the old economy, and for creating a place where ideas are exchanged for the sake of ideas.</p>

<p>Well that has changed; at FooCamp, ideas are exchanged for the sake of money, and first of all O'Reilly's money. When I now read Tim O'Reilly's list of "cuts" of the invitation process I get really pissed off. Every step of his description reads like blatant old capitalism, hidden under a guise of altruism.</p>

<p>Maybe I'm just annoyed because I dislike such quotas. I believe when you select all the guys that generate large numbers on your spreadsheet that you're missing out on important stuff. I have the suspicion that innovative ideas and monopolies don't play very well together.</p>

<p>I loved the Fuckparade, and I welcome the idea of <a href="http://barcamp.org/">BarCamp</a>. I'm all for the opposition.</p>

<p>See also: "<a href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008573.html">I’m not a FOO anymore either…</a>", "<a href="http://www.shellen.com/2005/08/why-im-not-going-to-foo-camp.asp">Why I'm not going to Foo Camp</a>", and a gazillion other blogs.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:creator>Martin Dittus</dc:creator>
      <category>commentary</category>
      <category>drop culture</category>
      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/08/define_elitism/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:59:53 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
